I woke up to a concept in my brain. I got it how it’s really true that my choices
were to do whatever it took to placate and get along with people because the
conditions of my being with them was that I absorb without complaint whatever
they gave me.
It is
true that for my parents to have been the parents I needed, that is, people who
could really see me and listen to me, and listen to my deeper intent, they would have had to have parents who
were able to do that for them.
What was
clear with Gary was that I had to absorb anything he threw at me if I was going
to be with him. There was no
negotiation, not because he was particularly intentional about that, but
because he was unable to be flexible of mind for long enough to see that what
he was asking for was not really reasonable to ask: that I absorb whatever he said or did, no
matter how unjust. And that I absorb it
without saying anything about it. I
think it was the same dynamic, from my childhood to my friendships,
relationships, and marriage. It was
clear I could not be with people unless I absorbed without complaint what they did or said. How I react inside to what they say or do is
my problem to deal with. There were very
strong feelings inside in response to the original situations. There was not help offered to help me deal
with them. And I suppose what made it
bearable was to second-guess the feelings I was having, to doubt myself. If it was possible the whole thing was my
fault, then I could stay with them. And,
it hurt a lot to believe that I was inherently at fault, and it weighed me down
with great sorrow and shame. But it kept
me in relationship.
I couldn’t
reconcile—I needed them, at least my parents; that was a given. So when they started doing things, because of
the misguided common wisdom on how to raise good kids (‘show ‘em who’s boss and
make them suffer if they don’t comply—and believe/rationalize
that you’re doing it for their own good—and don’t look at how your behavior
affects them, because their preferences are outranked by adults.) I had no idea
things should be different. Telling an
adult that what they were doing was causing you pain only caused you more pain
because it would offend them and they would think you were being insubordinate
in telling them. So they did things that
caused me pain and caused me more pain when I told them that what they were
doing to me caused me pain. So there is
no other choice but to conclude that there is something wrong with my inability
to not be deeply offended when they would behave a certain way toward me. So I came to believe that I am flawed; what they are
saying or doing is offensive to me because I
am too sensitive, or I missed something, or that I have such a mean spirit that
I don’t just put it away from me and not
allow myself to feel offended. And I
would keep piling on reasons why I was at fault: I was thinking about it too much, I was
‘endlessly analyzing’, I was “attached”, I was “too sensitive”. Basically I was wrong for experiencing their
behavior toward me as noxious in the first place. The early relationships were crucial, and did
set the pattern for others: their
expressions of love for me could turn off very suddenly if they were unhappy
with something I’d done. If I wasn’t
returned to equilibrium fast enough to not inconvenience them (and I might add,
without soft, intimate assistance to
return to equilibrium)(which meant I never learned how to bring myself back to
equilibrium, beyond attempting to swallow my disequilibrium and through force
of “positive thinking” neutralize it out of existence.) there was punishment. I never could, and then I believed
there was something wrong with me because I couldn’t
neutralize my disequilibrium out of existence. And then
I was very sad. And then any expression of
love or a hint of closeness with one of these people would feel to me like a
lifeline to my own worth.
I am worth
having my own feelings.
-->
I do hope
that I don’t turn into a person who demands of others that they blur our boundaries
and permit themselves to be my Object.
I believe it would be wrong for me to demand it. I believe it was demanded of me. I believe I had parents who confused
satisfying their own egos with raising good kids. I believe my parents believed that if their
children did something that threatened their internal sense of standing with
their friends, that this meant their children had been wicked, and this had to
be punished out of them. A kind of mild
demon exorcism, but cruel from the point of view of the child. I think in the medieval exorcisms of old, the
belief that they were engaging with something evil allowed them to loose their
own demons, only they deceived themselves into thinking that they were serving
good. But they were serving their own
sadistic impulses.
Not that my parents were at all sadistic. They just truly believed that in order to raise good people you had to make children suffer when they did something wrong. The rub comes from defining what "wrong behavior" is.
Not that my parents were at all sadistic. They just truly believed that in order to raise good people you had to make children suffer when they did something wrong. The rub comes from defining what "wrong behavior" is.
1 comment:
This is more than a little painful for me to read -- for you to live -- because of how dis-integrated this parenting style forced you to be, how divorced you had to be from your own inner self.
{{{Excavator}}}
Post a Comment